| SNo. | Case Detail | Decision Detail |
|
1
|
Case No.: EXE No. 20 of 2003
Title: INDER KAUR V/S HUDA
Urban Estate: Ambala
Court: DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-PANCHKULA
Advocate: Surakasha Sharda
System File No.: LR/UE025/DCF-PANKL/2003/004
|
Date: September 28,2004
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: decided
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
2
|
Case No.: CWP No. 5532 of 2007
Title: GURTEJ SINGH VS HUDA
Urban Estate: Ambala
Court: HIGH COURT-HARYANA
Advocate: Sikander Bakshi
System File No.: LR/UE025/HC-CHAND/2007/0023
|
Date: August 7,2008
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: Writ petition allowed and direction given to HUDA for allotment of plot to the petitioner under oustees quota as applied for in terms of policy.
Vide memo no.ADA-LT(S)/5243 dt.21-7-09 worthy CA directed to allot plot to Gurtej Singh by holding draw of lots at current prices as per policy
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
3
|
Case No.: RP No. 616 of 2007
Title: HUDA VS.SANJAY GOEL
Urban Estate: Faridabad
Court: NATIONAL COMMESSION-DELHI
Advocate: Neeraj Jain
System File No.: LR/UE001/NACOM-DELHI/2005/003
|
Date: March 21,2005
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: DISMISSED
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
4
|
Case No.: FA No. 89 of 1997
Title: M L SHARMA VS HUDA
Urban Estate: Gurgaon I
Court: STATE COMMISSION-PANCHKULA
Advocate: Vikas Kumar Bhusari
System File No.: LR/UE007/STCOM-PKL/1997/001
|
Date:
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: PETITION IS ALLOWED WITH THE DIRECTION THAT POSSESSION OF THE PLOT IF NOT ALREADY DELIVERED SHALL NOW BE DELIVERED POSITIVELY WITHIN 2 WEEKS FROM THE PAYMENT OF THE ADDITIONAL AMOUNT DEMANDED BY HUDA BY WAY OF ENHANCED COST OF THE LAND MINUS AMOUNT OF INTEREST FROM 19.4.90 ONWARDS AS STATED IN THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY EO HUDA DT. 26.3.96
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
5
|
Case No.: SLP No. 21144 of 2004
Title: HUDA VS SUBHAS SUCHDEVA
Urban Estate: Gurgaon I
Court: SUPREME COURT-DELHI
Advocate: S.S. Gulati
System File No.: LR/UE007/SC-DELHI/2004/001
|
Date:
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: DISMISSED
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
6
|
Case No.: FA No. 316 of 2002
Title: HUDA VS CHAND RAM
Urban Estate: Gurgaon I
Court: STATE COMMISSION-CHANDIGARH
Advocate: B.S. Walia
System File No.: LR/UE007/STCOM-CHD/2002/001
|
Date: June 27,2003
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: TO ALLOT ALTERNATIVE PLOT AT THE SAME RATE AND SAME TERMS AND CONDITION IN THE SAME SECTOR AND IN THE ADJOINING SECTOR
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
7
|
Case No.: RP No. 917 of 2006
Title: HUDA VS ARTI
Urban Estate: Gurgaon I
Court: NATIONAL COMMESSION-DELHI
Advocate: sanjay kumar
System File No.: LR/UE007/NACOM-DELHI/2006/002
|
Date: April 26,2006
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: DISMISSED
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
8
|
Case No.: CWP No. 14241 of 2006
Title: RAJ BALA VS STATE
Urban Estate: Gurgaon I
Court: HIGH COURT-HARYANA
Advocate: DOWN - DISPOSED OFF WITHOUT NOTICE
System File No.: LR/UE007/HC-HRY/2006/009
|
Date: September 7,2006
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: THE HONBLE COURT HAS ORDERED TO DISPOSE OF THE REPRESENTATION TO BE FILED BY PETITIONER BY SPEAKING ORDER WITHIN 4 MONTHS FROM THE DATE A COPY OF THIS ORDER IS RECEIVED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 I.E. EO HUDA GURGAON
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
9
|
Case No.: FA No. 1536 of 2002
Title: HUDA VS RAJ KUMAR SAHANI
Urban Estate: Gurgaon I
Court: STATE COMMISSION-PANCHKULA
Advocate: Raminder Gadhoke
System File No.: LR/UE007/STCOM-PKL/2002/004
|
Date: August 14,2007
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: DISPOSED OFF
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
10
|
Case No.: ARB No. 0 of 2005
Title: M/S WOODS ADVERTISER PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF HARYANA
Urban Estate: Gurgaon I
Court: HIGH COURT-HARYANA
Advocate: Arun walia
System File No.: LR/UE007/HC-HRY/2005/002
|
Date: October 23,2007
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: THE ARBITRATOR HAS AWARDED THE CLAIMS OF PETITONER AMOUNT TO RS. 63 LACS FOR ILLEGLELY CANCILATION OF CONTRACT AND HAS RESTORED THE AGREEMENT.
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
11
|
Case No.: FA No. 80 of 2005
Title: HUDA V/S ANITA
Urban Estate: Gurgaon II
Court: STATE COMMISSION-PANCHKULA
Advocate: Surakasha Sharda
System File No.: LR/UE007/STCOM-PKL/2004/0050
|
Date: July 12,2005
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: DISSMISED DT 07.12.05
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
12
|
Case No.: FA No. 2044 of 2003
Title: HUDA VS VIKRAM GARG
Urban Estate: Hisar
Court: STATE COMMISSION-PANCHKULA
Advocate: Raminder Gadhoke
System File No.: LR/UE012/STCOM-PKL/2005/0027
|
Date: October 24,2007
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: approval has been granted to implement the order by the CA Panchkula
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
13
|
Case No.: CC No. 293 of 2006
Title: SURENDER LOHAN VS. HUDA
Urban Estate: Hisar
Court: DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-HISAR
Advocate:
System File No.: LR/UE012/DCF-HISAR/2006/006
|
Date: March 10,2009
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief:
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
14
|
Case No.: FA No. 3073 of 2004
Title: HUDA VS DR. C.P. SONI
Urban Estate: Hisar
Court: STATE COMMISSION-PANCHKULA
Advocate: Raman Gaur
System File No.: LR/UE012/STCOM-PKL/2004/0012
|
Date: July 28,2009
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: dismissed
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
15
|
Case No.: CC No. 326 of 2005
Title: JANAK RANI VS. HUDA
Urban Estate: Kaithal
Court: DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-KAITHAL
Advocate: A.K. Sardana
System File No.: LR/UE015/DCF-KTHAL/2005/002
|
Date: September 9,2009
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: DECIDED
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal: September 15,2009
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
16
|
Case No.: CC No. 367 of 2006
Title: TARA CHAND VS. HUDA
Urban Estate: Kaithal
Court: DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-KAITHAL
Advocate: Rajesh Jangra
System File No.: LR/UE015/DCF-KTHAL/2006/001
|
Date: September 17,2009
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: Decided
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal: October 9,2009
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
17
|
Case No.: CC No. 523 of 2007
Title: GAURAV GOEL VS. HUDA
Urban Estate: Kaithal
Court: DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-KAITHAL
Advocate: Dinesh Kawatra
System File No.: LR/UE015/DCF-KTHAL/2008/001
|
Date: September 22,2009
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: Decided
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal: October 15,2009
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
18
|
Case No.: CWP No. 5188 of 1997
Title: BHUPINDER SINGH & OTHERS VS. HUDA
Urban Estate: Panchkula
Court: HIGH COURT-HARYANA
Advocate: P.M. ANAND
System File No.: LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/1997/0048
|
Date: September 11,1997
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: Accept the writ Petition.
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
19
|
Case No.: FA No. 1048 of 1999
Title: HUDA VS DEV DUTT GAUR
Urban Estate: Panchkula
Court: STATE COMMISSION-PANCHKULA
Advocate: O.P. Sharma
System File No.: LR/UE020/STCOM-PKL/1999/001
|
Date: March 10,2003
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: THE COMPLIANT AFTER TWO YEARS FROM THE DATE OF DEPOSITS TILL THE POSSESSION OF THE FULLY DEVELOPED PLOT IS ALLOTED.THE SAME IS REDUCED FROM 15% TO 9% SINCE THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN SUITABLY COMPENSATED BY AWARDING INTEREST THE CPMPENSATIOR IS REDUCED FROM Rs.25,000/- TO Rs 5,000/- AND REST PF THE ORDER OS MAINTAINED. THE IMPUGNED ORDER IS MODIFIED IN THE MANNER INDICIATED ABOVE AND THE APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY.
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
20
|
Case No.: SLP (C) No. 6845 of 2006
Title: STATE OF HARYANA ETC VS DAVINDER SINGH AND OTHERS
Urban Estate: Panchkula
Court: SUPREME COURT-DELHI
Advocate: Manjit Dalal
System File No.: LR/UE020/SC-DELHI/2006/005
|
Date: May 31,2005
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: AWARDED COMPOSITION OF RS.430 PER SQ.YARD FOR THE ACQUIRED LAND A LONG WITH STATURY BENIFITS AS PER THE AMENDED PROVISION OF THE ACT.
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal: May 20,2006
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
21
|
Case No.: CWP No. 20456 of 2006
Title: AASHOK KUMAR VS. HUDA
Urban Estate: Panchkula
Court: HIGH COURT-HARYANA
Advocate: Arun walia
System File No.: LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2006/00111
|
Date: August 21,2008
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: Disposed Off
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
22
|
Case No.: CWP No. 2035 of 2009
Title: BALWANT SINGH V/S STATE OF HRY & ORS.
Urban Estate: Panchkula
Court: HIGH COURT-HARYANA
Advocate:
System File No.: LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2009/00111
|
Date: February 10,2009
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF LEGAL NOTICE DATED 12/12/2008 IN THE LIGHT OF HUDA POLICY AND DISPOSE OF CLAIM WITHIN 2 MONTHS FROM DATE OF RECEIPT OF CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS ORDER
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
23
|
Case No.: RP No. 2221 of 2009
Title: HUDA VS DEVENDER DHAWAN
Urban Estate: Panchkula
Court: NATIONAL COMMESSION-DELHI
Advocate: PARSHAT KUMAR SHARMA
System File No.: LR/UE020/NACOM-DELHI/2008/004
|
Date: July 28,2009
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: AGAINST HUDA.
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|
|
24
|
Case No.: FA No. 539 of 2003
Title: HUDA VS VIJAY KUMAR
Urban Estate: Rewari
Court: STATE COMMISSION-PANCHKULA
Advocate: Amandeep S. Singhmar
System File No.: LR/UE010/STCOM-PKL/2003/001
|
Date:
Decision: Against HUDA
Decision Brief: TO ISSUE COMPLITION CERTIFICATE
Date of Taking Decision for Filling Appeal:
Appeal Filed: No
|